[PATCH 0 of 3] convertsvn compatibility with svn 1.4.3; fetch log on demand

[Brendan Cully]

On Sunday, 01 July 2007 at 19:33, Edouard Gomez wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 10:39:02 -0700, Brendan Cully wrote:
> > I'm not sure what the best way to coordinate this is.
> 
> Any ideas welcome, daniel offered me an hosting so we could share our 
> queues for a better convert. And though mq is good at preparing patches 
> for upstream, i think it's not really suited to collaboration between 
> people working on the same patches.
> 
> Would it be better to have mercurial repo branches set up for better 
> coordination ? Sure the patches that will result from such a tree will be 
> a mess unless one of us step ahead for preparing them, but at least we 
> will work together more efficiently.

I was going to suggest the same thing. A clone of crew with the svn
patches applied would suit me fine. I'd rather see the generic and
other-repo patches separated out though.