[PATCH 0 of 3] convertsvn compatibility with svn 1.4.3; fetch log on demand
Edouard Gomez
ed.gomez at free.fr
Sun Jul 1 15:34:22 CDT 2007
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 12:38:30 -0700, Brendan Cully wrote:
>> Would it be better to have mercurial repo branches set up for better
>> coordination ? Sure the patches that will result from such a tree will
>> be a mess unless one of us step ahead for preparing them, but at least
>> we will work together more efficiently.
>
> I was going to suggest the same thing. A clone of crew with the svn
> patches applied would suit me fine. I'd rather see the generic and
> other-repo patches separated out though.
What about i submit the patches we have on my queue right now, hope for
crew to review them quickly so we can work starting from that point ? I
can even merge your last bits in my queue before submission.
--
Edouard Gomez
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list