[PATCH] use iso8601-compliant dates by default (issue812)
dirkjan at ochtman.nl
Fri Feb 8 00:02:45 CST 2008
Matt Mackall wrote:
> As discussed on IRC, this changes output from way too many commands that
> our users are likely to be parsing with custom tools. We can't risk
> breaking users' toys just to be prettier.
I was thinking about this some more yesterday night, and I wondered if
it wouldn't be possible to have some of this. I think the original bug
report was about diffs, not log output. Additionally, I think most
people don't go about writing diff parsers as one-offs and hacks, and
existing diff parsers already cope with output like this as something
like GNU diff already uses a similar date format.
So how about just changing the date format for diffs, but not for log?
More information about the Mercurial-devel