one byte change to file not detected ?
adrian at cadifra.com
Wed Feb 20 18:05:37 CST 2008
On 20.02.2008 22:29, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> BuraphaLinux Server wrote:
>> I am writing a low-tech, brute-force RCS-->hg converter. It plods
>> through each file, pulling each successive rcs version and then doing
>> an hg commit.
> I'd suggest writing something within the existing convert framework
> instead. It will be much faster and safer than what you're currently doing.
I made a somewhat similar experience as Burapha a couple of weeks ago (but with
a slightly different outcome :-)
I've identified my problem and documented it at the bottom of
My (newbie) solution was to wait until the next second toggles
(did that in my Python beginner's piece I documented at
I then started to think about why Mercurial does it the way it does it and
became a fan of Mercurial when I realized *why* it does it like this.
With Perforce, I had to tell Perforce which file I want to "edit". I realized
how stupid that actually is and how often I "p4 edited" a whole tree and "p4
reverted" the unchanged files.
I wouldn't want to go back to Perforce. Mercurial's approach is better, but you
have to understand it and be careful with serial scripted hg commit calls - the
classical Mercurial newbie trap.
Hmm. Maybe I should add a note about that on
See also http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/bts/issue618
More information about the Mercurial-devel