[PATCH 2 of 3] move store walking from streamclone.py into store.py
Adrian Buehlmann
adrian at cadifra.com
Tue Jul 22 17:32:36 CDT 2008
On 22.07.2008 18:42, Adrian Buehlmann wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Adrian Buehlmann <adrian at cadifra.com>
> # Date 1216744400 -7200
> # Node ID 96e83d0c1cda5e4ae5082c9f253211e266643578
> # Parent e2d5df30568a1cbdd7399df7b82741b82d2bde26
> move store walking from streamclone.py into store.py
>
> add store classes
>
Matt, List
Is there anything left I can do for patch 1 and 2,
so that at least these two patches could be included
or should this work be dropped together with patch 3?
I'm asking because patch 1 and 2 were sure motivated
by now rejected patch 3, but it seems to me that 1 + 2
are an independent improvement over the current code,
even without patch 3.
So, is there anything left to do for patch 1 and 2?
Or should patch 1 and 2 be thrown away as well?
I'm talking about:
http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2008-July/007224.html
http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2008-July/007225.html
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list