[PATCH 2 of 3] move store walking from streamclone.py into store.py

Adrian Buehlmann adrian at cadifra.com
Wed Jul 23 09:05:57 CDT 2008


On 23.07.2008 12:05, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 22/07/2008, Adrian Buehlmann <adrian at cadifra.com> wrote:
>> I'm asking because patch 1 and 2 were sure motivated
>> by now rejected patch 3, but it seems to me that 1 + 2
>> are an independent improvement over the current code,
>> even without patch 3.
> 
> Can you summarise the discussion over patch 3, describing your
> approach and the issues Matt has with it? If you can do this, I'll
> look at whether it is something I would be able to pick up. I'd like
> to see the problem resolved, but I'm afraid I don't have time to go
> back through the various emails trying to pick out which issues have
> been addressed and which are outstanding.

No, I sure won't repeat here that discussion and summarising
is really the wrong thing.

> I'm working on the assumption that final versions of 1 and 2 get
> applied to crew, and that a cleaned up version of 3 is available,
> which applies without error on top of the versions of 1 and 2 that get
> applied. I'd be willing to pick up one patch, but not 3.

Do whatever you like. I'm currently only interested to save the
work I did for patch 1 and 2, as that part seems to be ok for
Matt.


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list