[PATCH 2 of 2] Treat extension load paths as relative to the defining hgrc

[Jesse Glick]

Thomas Arendsen Hein wrote:
> Imagine having a ~/.hgrc.d/paths.rc and ~/.hgrc ... should paths 
> defined in one file be handled differently from those defined in the 
> other?

How do you mean "differently"? Values in the [paths] section will be 
resolved relative to the location of the configuration file, which seems 
intuitive to me. My proposed patch simply does the same for 
[extensions]. I guess I don't understand what your objection is.