[PATCH 1 of 3] Added -A option to patchbomb to allow sending base64-encoded

Pjotr Kourzanov peter.kourzanov at xs4all.nl
Fri Mar 21 09:56:58 CDT 2008


Hi,

In mutt they do show fine (inlined) BTW. But I agree, I should not have
used new option to send to this list, since it is only useful for Lotus
Notes clients.

My apologies,

Pjotr

On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 15:23 +0100, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
> Hi Pjotr
> 
> FWIW: In Thunderbird your patches are shown and saved as the raw mime 
> content. Mailbomb patches thus can't easily be reviewed as they usually can.
> 
> I am not a Mercurial developer, but if I was I would ignore patches sent 
> this way because of this. Your changes might be good for other purposes, 
> but as it is they shouldn't be used here.
> 
> But looking into it the problems might come from the attachments having 
> two different encodings - and thunderbird apparently uses the first and 
> notes the second:
> 
> --===============1781373779==
> Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset="us-ascii"
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=hg-3.patch
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> 
> /Mads
> 
> 
> Pjotr Kourzanov wrote, On 03/21/2008 12:29 PM:
> > attachments (not inline) for easier integration with some email
> > clients like Lotus Notes running on Windows.
> >
> >
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > hgext/patchbomb.py |    7 +++++--
> >
> >
> >   
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mercurial-devel mailing list
> > Mercurial-devel at selenic.com
> > http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
> 



More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list