status of my patches

[Pjotr Kourzanov]

Ondrej, Benoit, et al,

Here they are:

http://www.selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2008-May/006225.html

http://www.selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2008-May/006224.html

Regards,

Pjotr

On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 16:36 +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Pjotr Kourzanov
> <peter.kourzanov at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >  Some time ago (in March), I've sent two changegroups relating to two
> > new features I've added to Mercurial:
> >
> > 1. -A option to patchbomb & related stuff to allow sending base64
> >    encoded attachments
> >
> > 2. Handling of *sh://host repo URLs for easier support of krb5-rsh etc.
> >
> >  I've seen that nothing has happened to these changegroups. Does this
> > mean that they are:
> >
> > a) dropped for a technical reason
> >
> > b) interesting to no-one except me (& my company, which is not the
> >   smallest one)
> >
> > c) assumed to maintained by me
> >
> >  In case of a) I would like to know this technical reason. In case of
> > b) I think Mercurial does require some minor patching to make it
> > suitable for clients using Notes (unfortunately there are quite some
> > I believe), as well as better integration with (large-scale)
> > environments where Kerberos is used. In case of c) I would like to
> > know how to contribute these changegroups to Mercurial mainline.
> 
> Hi Pjotr,
> 
> could you please post here the links to your patches?
> 
> Ondrej