[PATCH] mq: introduce the qunmanage command

Jason Orendorff jason.orendorff at gmail.com
Wed May 28 08:36:26 CDT 2008

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Christian Boos <cboos at neuf.fr> wrote:
> One can question which of the two, a MQ managed patch or a regular
> changeset, is the "higher ranked" object. From a MQ centric p.o.v, it's
> certainly a MQ patch. So by looking at the name of the command only, I
> would expect that with 'qpromote', MQ will promote a changeset to a
> patch... but in your idea it's the reverse, so I'm not sure the name
> helps to clarify what is going on.

I don't know that anyone has explicitly stated the problem we're
trying to solve here...

A newish MQ user is done with a patch and wants to push it.  He
doesn't know what command to use.  Note that this is one of a tiny
handful of commands that people need in order to use MQ for basic
everyday work (the others are qnew, qrefresh, qpush, and qpop).  Yet
our user types "hg help", looks at the "q" commands, and sees nothing

"qpromote" is an excellent name for this action, for the person in
this circumstance, the person we're trying to help.  "qfinish" is good
too.  But I have trouble imagining this user making the connection
between "qunmanage" and the task at hand.  "manage" is a boring,
almost meaningless word in English; it suggests "administrivia".  I
think users would tend to skip past "qmanage" when looking at the list
of commands, and "qunmanage" would look even less important.

Any of qpromote, qfinish, or qrelease is fine with me.  I think for
the specific person we're trying to help, "qfinish" does the best job
of jumping out of "hg help", saying "pick me, pick me!"


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list