[PATCH] keyword: get changectx via linkrev (w/o extra func)
dirkjan at ochtman.nl
Sat Nov 15 03:22:13 CST 2008
Christian Ebert wrote:
> Matt's proposal looked enticing as we already have the filelog,
> but I can't judge which alternative really[tm] is the better one.
> This one /looks/ even a bit shorter. But if the way via filectx
> is actually faster ...
Well, this code is exactly what the filectx() stuff does under the
covers, but it provides a higher abstraction, so it's still better, IMO.
More information about the Mercurial-devel