[issue1352] The pros and cons of git patch format should be documented

Sascha Wilde mercurial-bugs at selenic.com
Mon Oct 20 08:56:29 CDT 2008


New submission from Sascha Wilde <wilde at intevation.de>:

Currently neither the man page nor the --help text of the various
commands offering the --git option explain (all) the merits of the git
format (copy/rename history, handling of binary files, what else?).

There should be central documentation of the pros and cons of the
extended git format and --help texts should point to it for reference.

----------
messages: 7592
nosy: ThomasAH, wilde
priority: feature
status: unread
title: The pros and cons of git patch format should be documented
topic: documentation

____________________________________________________
Mercurial issue tracker <mercurial-bugs at selenic.com>
<http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/bts/issue1352>
____________________________________________________



More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list