[PATCH 0 of 2] Cherry picking with rebase
Matt Mackall
mpm at selenic.com
Wed Apr 1 14:33:09 CDT 2009
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 20:50 +0200, Stefano Tortarolo wrote:
> 2009/4/1 Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com>:
> > Well, first off it wants rebase's pseudo-merge magic, and second it
> > wants rebase's resume-after-interactive-merge magic.
> >
> > Whether it makes sense for this functionality to be named 'rebase' isn't
> > clear though. It might want to be 'transplant' instead.
>
> Ok, so put it on another way... do you think it is worth it to
> integrate such a feature in rebase or we should consider writing a
> separate extension?
To the extent is going to use about 90% of the code and hit most of the
same bugs, it should probably be in the rebase extension. But it might
have a different command name.
--
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list