[PATCH 0 of 7] Build documentation using distutils - v4

[Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen]

On 4 Dec 2009, at 07:36, Pascal Quantin wrote:

> Le 04/12/2009 00:17, Martin Geisler a écrit :
>> Pascal Quantin<pascal.quantin at gmail.com>  writes:
>> 
>>   
>>>> 2009-11-30  Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen<danchr at gmail.com>
>>>> 
>>>> 	* contrib/bash/hg, contrib/bash_completion, contrib/zsh/_hg,
>>>> 	contrib/zsh_completion, setup.py:
>>>> 	setup: install some useful data files.
>>>> 
>>>> 	The selection is somewhat arbitrary. In the case of the Zsh
>>>> 	completion file, it will not conflict with the builtin Zsh
>>>> 	completions: they are in a file named `_mercurial', not `_hg'.
>>>> 	[4a4fa19cd99d] [install-data.diff]
>>>> 
>>>>       
>>> Same thing here, the mercurial.iss script should be updated (and we
>>> could add the bash script also).
>>>     
>> After the renaming, the completion scripts are now called '_hg' and
>> 'hg'. So perhaps it's better to copy the folder too, i.e., to copy
>> 'zsh/_hg' and 'bash/hg'? But perhaps more importantly: are these files
>> even useful on Windows?
> 
> I was also surprised to see them in the package. I guess they could be useful for someone who installed mercurial through the win32 installer and who also uses cygwin.

You're right, we shouldn't install them on regular Windows. For cygwin users, I assume that ‘os.platform’ would be ‘unix’, causing it to be treated as one.

Martin, could I get you to spell out which patches you applied? Also, you mentioned that you hacked some of them; would you perhaps briefly explain what you did?

--

Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen
danchr at gmail.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1943 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20091204/a41971e5/attachment.bin>