DVCS PEP notes
timeless at gmail.com
Sun Jan 18 09:00:12 CST 2009
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Martin Geisler <mg at daimi.au.dk> wrote:
> The section continues with:
> This behavior might later be annoying if the branch, where a patch was
> transplanted to, merge with the mainline or vice versa because the
> specific change might get recorded twice in the history.
it sounds like this text will be changed, but i feel it's worth noting that
"merge with" here should be "merges with".
More information about the Mercurial-devel