[PATCH] patchbomb: send messages with a one second delay

[Greg Ward]

On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Giorgos Keramidas
> How about inserting an RFC-compatible "Date:" header with an incremental
> second count?  This /may/ help with mailers who resort, unless they look
> at the 'envelope date', in which case we are screwed without a sleep
> between every single patch message.

This sounds like a better solution than sleeping.  More mail clients
might actually look at "Date" than at envelope-level date headers,
since "Date" is specified in RFC 2822.

Greg