"hg since" extension

[Augie Fackler]

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, CG Linden <cg at lindenlab.com> wrote:
> Wouldn't 1.3 be an ancestor of 1.3.1? or do you transplant?

1.3 is an ancestor of 1.3.1, but work has been done in main that
didn't go into stable - thus there are revisions in soon-to-be-1.4
that are not descendants of 1.3.1, but it'd still be nice to see them
with since.

> --
> cg
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan at ochtman.nl> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 20:15, CG Linden <cg at lindenlab.com> wrote:
>> > I'm working on an extension to give me a good answer to the question
>> > "what
>> > changed since revision X". It appears trivially easy. Mark all ancestors
>> > of
>> > the specified revision as "seen", then list all unseen ancestors of
>> > "tip".
>>
>> For extra credit, take more than one root. Use case: see all the
>> changesets in history since tag 1.3 (on the main branch) and 1.3.1 (on
>> the stable branch). (I obviously agree that hg log doesn't cut it for
>> this.)
>>
>> I do hope you're already using the nodesbetween() code in hg, instead
>> of writing your own?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dirkjan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
>
>