push aborts for new branch even if no heads

[Dirkjan Ochtman]

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 20:04, Henrik Stuart <hg at hstuart.dk> wrote:
> When pushing, the existence of new remote heads is determined on a named
> branch basis, so you are, in effect, creating a new remote head for the
> branch t (even if it is merged into another branch it is still a branch
> head), thus you'll require --force.

Though if you --close-branch, then merge, it should still work, right?

(I still hold the position that we should change branch closing to
only be allowed in merges.)

Cheers,

Dirkjan