Try to improve help options text for basic commands
Faheem Mitha
faheem at email.unc.edu
Sat Nov 21 22:00:35 CST 2009
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Greg Ward wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Faheem Mitha <faheem at email.unc.edu> wrote:
>> +1 on saying something about DAGs. I think including something about
>> the DAG in the help would be a very good idea. Set up some
>> terminology, then it can be referenced in the rest of the help. This
>> has the big advantage of being precise, then we won't need to have
>> arguments about whether the wording is good enough.
>>
>> hg help DAG
>
> Good idea, but saying "DAG" is a bit too technical IMHO. (Not
> everyone studied CS in university.) What about "hg help concepts",
> since the graph of changesets is the core concept behind Mercurial?
> Lift some text from the wiki or Bryan's book, trim out excess words,
> and ta-da.
I think concepts is a bit vague. I don't think DAG is that terrifying and
it would still be my first choice. However, before worrying about exact
terminology let's see if there is buy-in for the general idea of such a
help topic.
Regards, Faheem.
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list