Should we include rst2man?

[Martin Geisler]

Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com> writes:

> On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 11:33 +0200, Martin Geisler wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> 
>> What do you think of this idea?
>> 
>> We can remove the rst2man tool again when Docutils 0.6 has been
>> released and packaged and when important bugs are fixed in the
>> upstream rst2man.
>
> Sounds good to me. In fact, I might wait quite a bit longer to take it
> back out to see how upstream matures.

Excellent! I agree that there is no hurry to take the rst2man script
back out -- Docutils development seems to follow its own slow pace so
our copy should stay "fresh" for a long time.

-- 
Martin Geisler

VIFF (Virtual Ideal Functionality Framework) brings easy and efficient
SMPC (Secure Multiparty Computation) to Python. See: http://viff.dk/.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20090903/ac5073e1/attachment.pgp