EOLTranslationPlan: store eol flags together with the execute bit?

[Adrian Buehlmann]

On 14.09.2009 14:22, Nicolas Dumazet wrote:
> 2009/9/14 Adrian Buehlmann <adrian at cadifra.com>:
>> I know that this requires some support in core Mercurial.
> 
> True, but the plan does not specify that EOL translation support HAS
> to be an extension.

"The solutions generally agree that we need .. to declare which files
the extension should convert"

Note: "the extension"

> If it's not intrusive, and does not break b/c, it can be included in
> core as soon as it's stable.

Interesting to know. Is it true?

But I assume the back door is in the term "not intrusive" :)