[PATCH 4 of 7] patch: drop internalpatch checks for NoHunks

Benoît Allard benoit at aeteurope.nl
Wed Apr 28 10:14:01 CDT 2010


Just my two cents:

Benoit Boissinot wrote:
> The idea is that if someone tries to patch something and we don't
> detect any changes, then it *must* be a bug.
> The fallback to externalpatcher in that case was a bad idea (and I
> tried to removed it), but I think it's better to be safe.
> 

Isn't this part of a normal mq workflow ? I can think of scenarii where 
I have empty mq patches: qnew without -f is one of them.

Regards,
Benoit
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 6031 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20100428/f51d5c8a/attachment.bin>


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list