mercurial 1.5 sprint was nice

[Augie Fackler]

On Feb 9, 2010, at 3:53 PM, Patrick Mézard wrote:

> With Dan and Steve we talked about getting record machinery into  
> core, extending existing commands with --interactive while  
> deprecating the related ones brought by the extension. This will  
> probably happen once record performs its patching and committing  
> work with an in memory API, like the one already used in  
> hgsubversion and bitbucket.

Is anyone actively working on making record use memctx and a  
mempatcher? I'd really love to tweak the API in patch so that it could  
handle in-memory patching without needing to monkeypatch the module,  
and would put the work in for that.