mercurial/crew at 10402: 2 new changesets - sharing init()/mqinit() code

Augie Fackler durin42 at gmail.com
Sun Feb 14 13:29:52 CST 2010


Actually, shouldn't init -Q (and qinit, while I'm complaining) add .hgignore to the repo and have it ignore the status file?

On Feb 14, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Brendan Cully wrote:

> On Sunday, 14 February 2010 at 13:17, Patrick Mézard wrote:
>> Le 09/02/10 03:51, Mercurial Commits a écrit :
>>> http://hg.intevation.org/mercurial/crew/rev/d216fa04e48a
>>> changeset:   10402:d216fa04e48a
>>> tag:         tip
>>> user:        Brendan Cully <brendan at kublai.com>
>>> date:        Mon Feb 08 10:50:00 2010 +0100
>>> summary:     mq: make init -Q do what qinit -c did
>> 
>> Shouldn't the mq.init() and mq.mqinit() code be unified at this point?
> 
> Yes, probably. I didn't bother only because qinit is deprecated, but I
> could.
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel



More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list