mercurial/crew at 10402: 2 new changesets - sharing init()/mqinit() code

Augie Fackler durin42 at gmail.com
Sun Feb 14 14:35:46 CST 2010


On Feb 14, 2010, at 2:31 PM, Brendan Cully wrote:

> On Sunday, 14 February 2010 at 13:29, Augie Fackler wrote:
> 
>> Actually, shouldn't init -Q (and qinit, while I'm complaining) add
>> .hgignore to the repo and have it ignore the status file?
> 
> It already does?

Lo and behold. Must never have *used* qinit before and been confusing the result with 'hg init .hg/patches'.


> 
>> On Feb 14, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Brendan Cully wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sunday, 14 February 2010 at 13:17, Patrick Mézard wrote:
>>>> Le 09/02/10 03:51, Mercurial Commits a écrit :
>>>>> http://hg.intevation.org/mercurial/crew/rev/d216fa04e48a
>>>>> changeset:   10402:d216fa04e48a
>>>>> tag:         tip
>>>>> user:        Brendan Cully <brendan at kublai.com>
>>>>> date:        Mon Feb 08 10:50:00 2010 +0100
>>>>> summary:     mq: make init -Q do what qinit -c did
>>>> 
>>>> Shouldn't the mq.init() and mq.mqinit() code be unified at this point?
>>> 
>>> Yes, probably. I didn't bother only because qinit is deprecated, but I
>>> could.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mercurial-devel mailing list
>>> Mercurial-devel at selenic.com
>>> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
>> 



More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list