mercurial/crew at 10402: 2 new changesets - sharing init()/mqinit() code
Augie Fackler
durin42 at gmail.com
Sun Feb 14 14:35:46 CST 2010
On Feb 14, 2010, at 2:31 PM, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Sunday, 14 February 2010 at 13:29, Augie Fackler wrote:
>
>> Actually, shouldn't init -Q (and qinit, while I'm complaining) add
>> .hgignore to the repo and have it ignore the status file?
>
> It already does?
Lo and behold. Must never have *used* qinit before and been confusing the result with 'hg init .hg/patches'.
>
>> On Feb 14, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Brendan Cully wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, 14 February 2010 at 13:17, Patrick Mézard wrote:
>>>> Le 09/02/10 03:51, Mercurial Commits a écrit :
>>>>> http://hg.intevation.org/mercurial/crew/rev/d216fa04e48a
>>>>> changeset: 10402:d216fa04e48a
>>>>> tag: tip
>>>>> user: Brendan Cully <brendan at kublai.com>
>>>>> date: Mon Feb 08 10:50:00 2010 +0100
>>>>> summary: mq: make init -Q do what qinit -c did
>>>>
>>>> Shouldn't the mq.init() and mq.mqinit() code be unified at this point?
>>>
>>> Yes, probably. I didn't bother only because qinit is deprecated, but I
>>> could.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mercurial-devel mailing list
>>> Mercurial-devel at selenic.com
>>> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
>>
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list