[PATCH 6 of 9] record extension: removed 'has_key' usage

[Renato Cunha]

On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 01:33:37AM +0200, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
> backups is visible inside has_key, so couldn't it just be
> 
>             def has_key(key):
>                 return key in backups
>             hg.revert(repo, repo.dirstate.parents()[0], has_key)
> 
> or even
> 
>             hg.revert(repo, repo.dirstate.parents()[0], lambda key: key in backups)

Fair enough. But I believe Greg's suggestion is slightly better, as it is a
bit more direct. (Or not?)

-- 
Renato Cunha <http://renatocunha.com>
Blog: http://valedotrovao.com
"Do, or do not. There is no 'try'".
              -- Jedi Master Yoda