mercurial at 11238: 10 new changesets (3 stable)
hg at hstuart.dk
Fri Jun 4 12:29:25 CDT 2010
On 04-06-2010 08:41, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 21:42, Henrik Stuart <hg at hstuart.dk> wrote:
>> Right you are. Pushed an updated patch utilising your journal
>> suggestion. Thanks.
> I know I'm a little late to the party, but have we considered some
> other scheme for doing multiple queues? For example, by having
> multiple series files in a single directory?
> (It would be nice for keeping multiple stacks of patches in a single
> repository... But on the other hand the current behavior might be
> nicer for perusing other's patch queue repositories.)
I considered it, but I preferred separating the different queues more
completely (I often work with multiple versioned patch queues against
crew, for instance); this also side-steps the issue of what to do if two
queues use a patch with the same name (but they are different patches).
This solution deals with extending the already very powerful queue
concept with another meta level in a very non-intrusive way, supporting
multiple series in the same directory would at least have required extra
logic for same patch name cases.
More information about the Mercurial-devel