[PATCH] merge: improve error messages when aborting because of head count

[Dirkjan Ochtman]

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 01:05, Greg Ward <greg-hg at gerg.ca> wrote:
> But that also prints out 112 branch heads, around 105 of which are
> ancient history.  If you had said "hg branches -a", sure, that would
> make sense.  It's not quite the same as "hg heads -t", but it's close
> enough most of the time.

I think we were trying to eradicate the notion of "active"?

It's way too random for most users to understand.

Cheers,

Dirkjan