Performance issues when merging branches (1000+ files being merged takes 75~ seconds)
Idan K
idan at kamarafamily.com
Thu Jun 17 10:47:17 CDT 2010
I see, that explains it. So after the fix it should drop down to around 15
seconds I guess. Still not close to git's 1 second, but a very nice
improvement nonetheless ;-)
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Peter Arrenbrecht <
peter.arrenbrecht at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Idan K <idan at kamarafamily.com> wrote:
> > I found another interesting thing, don't know if it helps: I took
> Mercurial
> > 1.5.4 source without history, put it in a new repository and ran the test
> > again, the runtime dropped down to about 15 seconds. Still quite a bit
> but
> > doesn't compare to the one with all the history (I attached the output of
> > the merge).
>
> In this case ancestor computation is trivial, so the main problem goes
> away.
> -parren
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20100617/c6a5df30/attachment.htm>
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list