Rename qpush --move to --grab

[Matt Mackall]

On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 11:19 +0200, Martin Geisler wrote:
> Gilles Moris <gilles.moris at free.fr> writes:
> 
> > I am not very well placed to bikeshed about wording, but 1.6 will be
> > coming very soon and this is the time for me to speak before it's to
> > late.
> 
> I'm afraid it is already very late since we are in the middle of the
> feature freeze:
> 
>   http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/TimeBasedReleasePlan
> 
> > At one point of time, Martin proposed 'hg qpush --grab' for this
> > option that takes an unapplied patch and push it, instead of pushing
> > the next patch. I hope Mads will not mind that I am promoting 'grab'
> > instead of the original 'hg qpush --move', but I find 'grab' more
> > explicit than 'move' which is kind of generic. I am not opposed to
> > other suggestions if someone has a better idea.
> 
> Since this code has not been released yet (the --move flag was added in
> changeset 590b1d6ef50b on 2010-04-30), I would be okay with this trivial
> renaming at this point.
> 
> What does Matt and the rest of crew say?

I prefer move.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.