[PATCH 1 of 1] Add support for ui.one_filesystem in hgrc

Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen danchr at gmail.com
Wed Mar 31 15:50:48 CDT 2010


On 31 Mar 2010, at 16:37, Lars Damerow wrote:

> From Benoit Boissinot <bboissin at gmail.com>, Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 04:32:40PM +0200:
>> 
>> Yes. But if you have a subdirectory foo on another FS, then hg status
>> will still happily stat everything under foo/, and hg add will add any
>> unknown file from foo/, etc.
>> 
>> So it's not really true that hg won't cross FS boundary with this
>> option. (sorry if I wasn't clear on my first e-mail)
> 
> I see what you mean now. Would a name like "root-on-same-filesystem" be
> better? It feels a bit long to me, but I can't think of a way to make
> the name more explanatory in a shorter name.

How about retaining the shorter name,[*] but documenting that it doesn't (yet) affect anything other than locating the root?

[*] My suggestion for the name: ‘traverse-filesystems’

--

Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen
danchr at gmail.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1943 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20100331/583556c7/attachment.bin>


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list