Bookmarks in core?
didlybom at gmail.com
Tue Nov 30 17:10:58 CST 2010
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Augie Fackler <durin42 at gmail.com> wrote:
> For me, use of bookmarks and revsets has completely replaced mq in almost
> all cases. I now only use mq for amending a changeset or looking at mqs from
> others. Bookmarks combined with some kind of pushkey-based dead heads feels
> like it could be a compelling replacement for mq to me.
> I'm not sure it makes all that much to bring in bookmarks without some form
> of dead heads functionality.
could you please explain how do bookmarks + revsets subsitute mq? To me they
are quite unrelated features...
As a user it'd be nice if bookmarks were integrated into core and makes it
easier to share your bookmarks, so this gets a +1 from me.
Actually I like the idea of somehow reducing the gap between tags and
bookmarks, especially if that meant that we could get rid of all those ugly
"extra commits" that are introduced when you add a non local tag (yuk!).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mercurial-devel