Marking subrepos in 'hg status'

[timeless]

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Martin Geisler <mg at aragost.com> wrote:
> That is strange since the subrepo has not been added. An alternative
> would be to move the recusion up, so that all status lines are kept
> together for each subrepo:
>
>  $ hg status -S
>  M dir/x.txt
>  A dir/y.txt
>  M sub/
>  M sub/a.txt
>  A sub/b.txt
>
> which I think works better, though it results in scrambled order of
> added and modified files. What do you guys think?

what if i'm annoying and do hg st -S -a?