Liquid HG, (was: Sprint discussions/topics/outcome?)

Matt Mackall mpm at selenic.com
Sat Oct 16 14:04:25 CDT 2010


On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 16:51 +0200, Isaac Jurado wrote:

> > Spending time on MQ is definitely worth it: from MQ perspective,
> > adding liquid HG features will just mean improving usability and
> > extending features.
> 
> Will this allow pushing and pulling patch queues along?  I know I can do
> it with a patch queue repository, but the use I give to MQ is very
> volatile.

Yes. Think of it this way: current mq refuses to push mq csets because
there was no way to communicate that those changesets might disappear.
Liquid hg is how we fix that.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.




More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list