Marking subrepos in 'hg status'

[Martin Geisler]

timeless <timeless at gmail.com> writes:

> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Martin Geisler <mg at aragost.com> wrote:
>> That is strange since the subrepo has not been added. An alternative
>> would be to move the recusion up, so that all status lines are kept
>> together for each subrepo:
>>
>>  $ hg status -S
>>  M dir/x.txt
>>  A dir/y.txt
>>  M sub/
>>  M sub/a.txt
>>  A sub/b.txt
>>
>> which I think works better, though it results in scrambled order of
>> added and modified files. What do you guys think?
>
> what if i'm annoying and do hg st -S -a?

See, that is a good question... :) I guess you should not see the 'M
sub/' line in that case, so the output would be

  $ hg status -S --added
  A dir/y.txt
  A sub/b.txt

Since the user has asked us to prune the list, I think it is okay that
there is no indication of the subrepo.

-- 
Martin Geisler

aragost Trifork
Professional Mercurial support
http://aragost.com/mercurial/