Marking subrepos in 'hg status'

[timeless]

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Martin Geisler <mg at aragost.com> wrote:
> With your suggestion we can have
>
>   M sub1/
>   M sub1/a
>   M sub2/
>   M sub2/x
>   A sub1/
>   A sub1/b
>   A sub2/
>   A sub2/y
>
> Where we first sort by state and then by subrepo. It does lead to quite
> a few mentions of each subrepository, though.

Only in the case where there are lots of sub repos with very few
changes. In the normal case you'll probably have >6 dirty files per
sub repo. Or you'll have subrepos with very few distinct states. I
don't think it's such a big problem.