The 1.7 freeze has started!

[Paul Boddie]

Matt Mackall wrote:
> At any rate, most of the world appears to still be on Python 2.6 and can
> blissfully ignore that's there's no 2.8 planned for probably another
> year or more. Which means the Python devs still have a year to come to
> their senses about discontinuing the language people actually use.
>   

Indeed. In fact, I don't think there'll be a 2.8 at all, but maybe we'll 
all be using PyPy as our "normal" Python by the time it would, under 
other circumstances, have appeared.

Paul