Updating Mercurial: The Definitive Guide

[Na'Tosha Bard]

Hi Again,

In terms of a schedule to tell the O'Reilly people, do we think it's safe to
say that we can try to be done by the 2.0 release at the first of November?
 That gives us 2.5 months for writing and editing.

I'd like to know what the other contributors think of that timeline before I
answer to the O'Reilly people :-)

Cheers,
Na'Tosha

On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Na'Tosha Bard <natosha at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Sending this to the dev and user lists because I don't think anyone has
> signed up for the hgbook mailing list, other than me ;-)
>
> As has been previously mentioned, we're ready to start updating the
> Mercurial book.  The home repository is here:
> https://bitbucket.org/natosha_bard/hgbook
>
> I'd prefer if the way we do this is by making forks and submitting pull
> requests.  Pretty much everyone and their grandmother in the Mercurial
> community already has a BitBucket account, so this should be painless.
>
> I'm about to start writing a section on rebasing.  We need volunteers with
> appropriate expertise to take up (among other things) the following
> subjects: named branches, subrepos, bookmarks, and revsets.
>
> Volunteers?  Please? :-D
>
> Cheers,
> Na'Tosha
>



-- 
"Pain is temporary; quitting lasts forever."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20110808/25405284/attachment.html>