Plea for mercurial_keyring to be pulled into tree

[Dirkjan Ochtman]

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 16:46, Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com> wrote:
> This means a) we have someone committed to maintaining the code once we
> accept it and b) has proved that they can work within the project's
> parameters.

https://bitbucket.org/Mekk/mercurial_keyring/changesets

Looks like both Patrick and Steve have been contributing, suggesting
that it should be safe to pull in.

Cheers,

Dirkjan