Updating Mercurial: The Definitive Guide

[Augie Fackler]

On 8/8/2011 4:19 PM, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 20:01 +0200, Na'Tosha Bard wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Matt Mackall<mpm at selenic.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 15:43 +0200, Na'Tosha Bard wrote:
>>>> Hi Again,
>>>>
>>>> In terms of a schedule to tell the O'Reilly people, do we think it's safe
>>> to
>>>> say that we can try to be done by the 2.0 release at the first of
>>> November?
>>>>   That gives us 2.5 months for writing and editing.
>>>
>>> I'd be really surprised if things got done that quickly. I'd say Mar 1
>>> is a more likely target.
>>>
>>
>> OK, so that would be going out with the 2.1 release, then?
>
> Assuming that we don't change the release schedule. But it seems that
> the selling point will be "covers 2.0!" in any case.
>

I concur, March sounds more reasonable than November.