Deprecating inactive heads

[Matt Mackall]

On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 00:08 +0200, Isaac Jurado wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Speaking of cognitive processes, and a bit off topic.  Do all these
> >> recent proposal have something to do with the major number change?
> >> Even if there are no backward incompatibilities, isn't it a bit true
> >> that we all tend to like this feeling of newness?
> >
> > Not really. At this rate, 2.0 will be a pretty tame release compared
> > to 1.9.
> 
> So, does this mean that general delta is not ready for prime time yet?

I think we need more testing and tuning to turn it on by default.


-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.