[issue3175] incorrect(or ambiguous) explanation of "--force" for rollback in online help

[Alexander Sauta]

That's funny, but I also noticed this line in .po file this morning)
--
Alexander Sauta



2011/12/29 FUJIWARA Katsunori <bugs at mercurial.selenic.com>:
>
> New submission from FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy at lares.dti.ne.jp>:
>
> in online help for rollback command, "--force" is explained as:
>
>    To avoid data loss, you must pass --force in this case
>
> but current implementation seems to AVOID rollbacking in
> the situation described in help document WITHOUT "--force",
> and to complete rollbacking with "--force" even though such action
> causes data loss.
>
> ----------
> messages: 18435
> nosy: foozy
> priority: bug
> status: unread
> title: incorrect(or ambiguous) explanation of "--force" for rollback in online help
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Mercurial issue tracker <bugs at mercurial.selenic.com>
> <http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue3175>
> ____________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel