[PATCH] backout: make help more explicit about what backout does

[Jonathan Nieder]

Gilles Moris wrote:

> Why are you switching to the past tense just here? May be:
> +    Otherwise, a merge IS necessary, so you should inspect ITS result
> +    and then commit it.
[...]

> On Wednesday 02 February 2011 09:10:27 am Jonathan Nieder wrote:

>> +    of REV that simply undoes REV.  Otherwise, the next commit will
>> +    have one parent, maintaining a linear history.
>
> Tentatively:
> + have JUST one parent, ...
[...]
> Please feel free to discard those non English speaker comments if you think 
> they don't make sense.

I agree with them all.

I'll wait for other comments to come in and try rerolling the
patch tomorrow afternoon.  Thanks for looking it over.

'night,
Jonathan