[PATCH 5 of 5] run-tests: use subprocess.Popen on all systems
Martin Geisler
mg at lazybytes.net
Wed Feb 9 11:32:51 CST 2011
Simon Heimberg <simohe at besonet.ch> writes:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Simon Heimberg <simohe at besonet.ch>
> # Date 1296593286 -3600
> # Node ID 41b708fd0aa6167ac264846ff2141f61a1cf5904
> # Parent 797b0e0c0d239e78439b373e5e388ec32cddb039
> run-tests: use subprocess.Popen on all systems
Great idea, but see below :)
> diff -r 797b0e0c0d23 -r 41b708fd0aa6 tests/run-tests.py
> --- a/tests/run-tests.py Die Feb 08 07:20:34 2011 +0100
> +++ b/tests/run-tests.py Die Feb 01 21:48:06 2011 +0100
> @@ -584,19 +584,11 @@
> def run(cmd, options, replacements):
> """Run command in a sub-process, capturing the output (stdout and stderr).
> Return a tuple (exitcode, output). output is None in debug mode."""
> - # TODO: Use subprocess.Popen if we're running on Python 2.4
> if options.debug:
> proc = subprocess.Popen(cmd, shell=True)
> ret = proc.wait()
> return (ret, None)
>
> - if os.name == 'nt' or sys.platform.startswith('java'):
> - tochild, fromchild = os.popen4(cmd)
> - tochild.close()
> - output = fromchild.read()
> - ret = fromchild.close()
> - if ret is None:
> - ret = 0
> else:
> proc = Popen4(cmd)
> def cleanup():
This looks wrong -- I would expect the code in the else-branch to be
dedented one level now that the if-statement disappears?
--
Martin Geisler
Mercurial links: http://mercurial.ch/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20110209/631c2c12/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list