[PATCH 0 of 3] handling of truncated bundles

[Matt Mackall]

On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 03:38 +0100, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Matt, did you have a bundle test case that could go with these changes?

Not as such, no. But a bundle truncated with dd seems to do the trick on
one of the paths.

> Are the new strict checks OK? It wasn't an intended protocol flexibility that
> has been utilized somewhere?

Looks good, all three queued.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.