[PATCH STABLE] update copyright year to 2011

Gilles Moris gilles.moris at free.fr
Tue Jan 4 02:23:01 CST 2011


On Tuesday 04 January 2011 02:20:47 am Mads Kiilerich wrote:
> Matt Mackall wrote, On 01/03/2011 11:00 PM:
> > On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 20:38 +0200, timeless wrote:
> >> I'd like to argue against this.
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536336#c0
> >>
> >> has a detailed explanation of why this isn't really the right approach.
> >>
> >> note that it's in the context of localization costs, but the argument
> >> is against the (c) line.
> >
> > Seems reasonable. And if it got past Mozilla's lawyers, it's probably
> > good enough for us. Let's drop the date.
>
> FWIW FSF has a different opinion -
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html .
>
> Software Freedom Conservancy don't have an opinion on that?
>

You may also want to look at 
http://www.copyright.com/viewPage.do?pageCode=cr10-n

Regards.
Gilles.


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list