Experimental implementation of liquid-hg
Pierre-Yves David
pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org
Wed Jan 19 10:25:49 CST 2011
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:56:32AM -0500, Eric Eisner wrote:
> Could frozen and liquid changesets be implemented entirely as published and
> unpublished? Every push or pull would transparently mark copied changesets
> forever into the frozen category (on server and client), without the need
> for a pushkey protocol. All local changes are by definition unpublished and
> are free to be rebased, mq'd, stripped etc.
>
> I'll admit to not following all of the paths of this discussion, so which
> proposed use cases require an explicit marking of liquid history?
Counter argument are in this email.
http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2011-January/027591.html
--
Pierre-Yves
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list