[PATCH 1 of 1 V5] revert: improve hint on abort if no files were specified

[Adrian Buehlmann]

On 2011-06-20 18:25, Kevin Bullock wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2011, at 1:43 AM, Adrian Buehlmann wrote:
> 
>> On 2011-06-17 21:42, Matt Mackall wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 13:56 +0200, Adrian Buehlmann wrote:
>>>> clean, revert to non-parent:
>>>>
>>>>  BEFORE:
>>>>    $ hg revert -d 2011-05-05
>>>>    Found revision 7423 from Thu May 05 19:56:05 2011 +0200
>>>>    abort: no files or directories specified
>>>>    (use --all to revert all files)
>>>>
>>>>  NEW:
>>>>    $ hg revert -d 2011-05-05
>>>>    Found revision 7423 from Thu May 05 19:56:05 2011 +0200
>>>>    abort: no files or directories specified
>>>>    (use --all to revert all files, or 'hg update -r 7423' to update)
>>>
>>> discard?
>>
>> What's to be discarded if the working directory is all clean?
> 
> All the changes between the specified revision and the current state. I agree, I think discard is appropriate here.

Well. Losing uncommitted edits or not is a rather big difference in my book.