[PATCH 2 of 2] New output message from hg pull suggests better update action when a new branch head is added
bboissin at gmail.com
Sat Mar 12 12:40:08 CST 2011
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 16:45 +0100, Benoit Boissinot wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Kevin Berridge
>> <kevin.w.berridge at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > # HG changeset patch
>> > # User Kevin Berridge <kevin.w.berridge at gmail.com>
>> > # Date 1299894913 18000
>> > # Node ID 90b19cade98425061f755120ffef2849e122e952
>> > # Parent 91ce954ac34a868124f49570e72aca4b012ac43c
>> > New output message from hg pull suggests better update action when a new branch head is added.
>> Same command as the first patch, and please fold both patches
>> together, no need to split them.
> ..except that I asked him to!
Hum, sorry. What was the reason? Is the second change more controversial?
I thought that since the first change introduced the message, we might
as well change it in the first patch.
More information about the Mercurial-devel