Dealing consistently with subrepositories
Martin Geisler
mg at aragost.com
Wed Mar 30 04:57:29 CDT 2011
Pradeepkumar Gayam <in3xes at gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:52:26AM +0200, Martin Geisler wrote:
>
>> What do people think of this grouping? Does it make sense or would
>> you group things differently?
>
> Some commands are not mentioned here and possible to recurse through
> subreops.
>
> bookmarks
> branch
> bundle/unbundle
> export/import
> tag
> rollback
What equivalence classes do you put them into?
bundle <-> unbundle ?
export <-> import <-> diff ?
> Above command's behaviour is mentioned in the wiki[1]. Is that final?
>
> [1] http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/SubrepoWork
The wiki page was just a scratch pad for me... I put it there so that
interested parties could have a look and I remember Patrick did so. The
page could probably go now -- it's certainly not describing any sort of
final or agreed plan.
> And grep, locate, verify, tip can be extended with --subrepo option
>
> What about manifest?
I would probably say
manifest <-> locate <-> status
so manifest and locate should recurse iff status does.
--
Martin Geisler
aragost Trifork
Professional Mercurial support
http://aragost.com/en/services/mercurial/blog/
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list